> there could be some public space where it is legal to be homeless. Of course! And that's precisely what this case is about. It's not saying that city governm

> there could be some public space where it is legal to be homeless. Of course! And that's precisely what this case is about. It's not saying that city governments should never remove people from public spaces. It's saying if you don't have a space where it is legal to be homeless, only then can you not legally remove homeless people from public spaces.