4 ms·
Alternatively, there could be some public space where it is legal to be homeless. The area could be fitted with bathrooms and other services. The issues are th
by agent281 2y ago
Alternatively, there could be some public space where it is legal to be homeless. The area could be fitted with bathrooms and other services.
The issues are that cities may be concerned about liability in that space and where you could put that space without angering some residents.
Additionally, a lot of homeless people would probably rather have their own space so they would reject a city sanctioned location for homeless people.
Unfortunately, it seems like an unlikely solution.
- PheonixPharts 2y ago> there could be some public space where it is legal to be homeless. Of course! And that's precisely what this case is about. It's not saying that city governments should never remove people from public spaces. It's saying if you don't have a space where it is legal to be homeless, only then can you not legally remove homeless people from public spaces.
- 8f2ab37a-ed6c 2y agoThen we're in accord, thanks for clarifying.
- euniceee3 2y agoThat is literally what Slab City is. The land belongs to the CA Teachers Union, so it comes down to who will allow for their land to be used for perpetual squatting?