Ordering someone to return to their home is one thing. The question is more complicated when the person does not have a private residence. “Removing” someone fr

Ordering someone to return to their home is one thing. The question is more complicated when the person does not have a private residence. “Removing” someone from one spot doesn’t make them cease to exist- they have to then be put somewhere else. Certainly local governments aren’t depositing them onto private property, so the only options are other public property (including jail). I don’t follow why this practice being placed off limits for Constitutional reasons would cause local government to somehow lose its authority to govern. In our system, local governments can’t do plenty of things to their citizens, even in public spaces. Their ability to govern nevertheless remains intact.