> But it falls apart a little because it seems to be talking about coins (even if it's actually talking about koins), which is a domain that starts from the pre

> But it falls apart a little because it seems to be talking about coins (even if it's actually talking about koins), which is a domain that starts from the premise that events are independent. And that premise is empirically false as noted by the author. Now the question is whether it's meaningful to accuse people of committing fallacies in hypothetical scenarios where perfectly fair coins are real.