3 ms·
Then it'd be very purposeful, the idea of this kind of patch would be that someone Googling random older PG answers to fix a random issue wouldn't be tempted to
by whizzter 3y ago
Then it'd be very purposeful, the idea of this kind of patch would be that someone Googling random older PG answers to fix a random issue wouldn't be tempted to just issue an ALTER command, think the issue is fixed and then find out after a restart/rebuild that the fix is not there any more.
This not a security patch but more of a safeguard against hapless idiots manhandling themselves without resistance in an unsupported case.
- kbenson 3y agoAs a comment on the LWN article noted, it might be better to think of it as a safety feature, not a security feature.