3 ms·
> Alcott and colleagues (2020) randomly assigned 2743 adults. I stopped there. We're talking specifically about teenage depression and the cited study is adult
by kelseyfrog 3y ago
> Alcott and colleagues (2020) randomly assigned 2743 adults.
I stopped there. We're talking specifically about teenage depression and the cited study is adults. If Haidt wants us to take results from one subgroup and apply it to another, he has to provide evidence. That's how this process works.
- neglesaks 3y agoYou conveniently stopped reading at the first cite, before he provided more experimental evidence.
- kranke155 3y agoBecause he has no intention of being convinced by data that goes against his beliefs, which is an ego based anti scientific stance.
- kelseyfrog 3y agoI'm much more interested in the rhetorical device, "I stopped reading at X and couldn't take anything after that seriously." It looks like I have some more learning to do before employing it successfully.
- cap1434 3y agoProject much?
- kranke155 3y agohow did I project? Where do you see me doing the same thing?
- hackerlight 3y agoThis is weirdly uncharitable. Why would you stop there when there's 22 experimental studies[1] and the majority of the article left to read? [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w-HOfseF2wF9YIpXwUUtP65-olnkPyWcgF5BiAtBEy0/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w-HOfseF2wF9YIpXwUUtP65-...
- tomrod 3y ago> If Haidt wants us to take results from one subgroup and apply it to another, he has to provide evidence. That's how this process works. Perhaps considering where he does so, further in the article which you stopped reading.