4 ms·

I wouldn't compare osm-website and osm-carto at all. The commit logs are very different. openstreetmap-website: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-

I wouldn't compare osm-website and osm-carto at all. The commit logs are very different. openstreetmap-website: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/commits https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/commi... . Numerous commits most days. openstreetmap-carto: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/commits https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/commits . So far in 2024; one small regression fixed, one niche bit of tagging added to an existing style, some largely pointless code style tidying. That's it.

RicoElectrico 2y ago
Sure, you're right - I haven't checked osm-carto in a while. Nonetheless, the barrier to contributing to osm-website is too high and the maintainers also not welcoming. TomH is infamous for his comments that brush off even OSMF board members. The openstreetmap-website is due for improvements, but the same thing applies - maintainers are very finicky and even worse, one of them is abrasive as hell. Elsewhere in the comments it was pointed out about hostility to experimentation, the same applies to openstreetmap-website. There are many things that could be tried on the front-end, but in the eyes of TomH you need to be perfect at the first shot, based on his understanding of the situation. Somebody pointed out that openstreetmap-website contributions pace curiously picked up after the NorthCrab's blogs detailing his unofficial and unsolicited Python rewrite, OpenStreetMap NG. Honestly even if he's somewhat cringe at times, he's still more adaptive than TomH and co. E.g. people pointed out that Mongo is fauxpen source so he duly rewrote the DB part in Postgres.