3 ms·
I didn’t interpret anything tbh. I just found the passage to be interesting. It’s dangerous to have an opinion on this topic on HN ;)
by baxtr 3y ago
I didn’t interpret anything tbh. I just found the passage to be interesting.
It’s dangerous to have an opinion on this topic on HN ;)
- verisimi 3y agoIt is impossible to have an opinion on this topic without being personally scorched (as opposed to being 'globally warmed'). I appreciated the research you and the OP did. I pointed out the ideas that co2 was fingered as the cause was not supported by the quote you posted. I also pointed out that a totally opposed position was also possible from the same info - that the the idea of climate alarmism. Ie you could say 'climate alarmism' has been around for a long time in order to raise fear to get the masses to move in a particular way, and that the historical facts are re-interpreted for the present day - ie that 'pollution' is the same as 'co2'.