4 ms·

I worked for a company that claimed to use this system. Got fired after arguing with my totally no boss.

• b112 2y ago
  You mean your 'advisor'?
• Barrin92 2y ago
  Over half a century old but as relevant as ever, The Tyranny of Structurelessness https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm This means that to strive for a structureless group is as useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective" news story, "value-free" social science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez faire" group is about as realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes a smokescreen for the strong or the lucky to establish unquestioned hegemony over others. This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal structures, only formal ones.
  • mcbishop 2y ago
    There's strong structure with holacracy. There's a hierarchy of roles / responsibilities. It seeks to mitigate parallel informal power dynamics. Consider reading the book.
• goodpoint 2y ago
  > claimed That's the issue: hidden power structures. But holacracy is not automatically false.