3 ms·
> Starting to think you don't know Dennett Starting to think you haven't read very much of him, or haven't bothered to actually engage with what you've read.
by pdonis 3y ago
> Starting to think you don't know Dennett
Starting to think you haven't read very much of him, or haven't bothered to actually engage with what you've read.
> You're starting to reveal your lack of experience here. It's not something that can be debunked
Tell that to all the people who have written articles debunking it.
> I wish this was a better conversation, brush up!
I'm having the same thought about you. So I doubt we're going to make much progress.
- _akhe 3y ago> debunking I don't even agree with Dennett, just pointing out what his stance is in response to your weird attack. A stance that everyone knows except you apparently, didn't even know it was argued. He is eliminative of consciousness, and is basically famous as a philosopher for it, second to the religious stuff.
- pdonis 3y ago> I don't even agree with Dennett That's obvious. But I do. However, it's also obvious that the Dennett I agree with is not the Dennett that you disagree with. And what's more, it's obvious that we're not going to resolve that here. We agree he's a famous philosopher. That's enough for here.