> When discussing a law let's not discuss alleged things, be precise and talk about facts, was it done or not? You know full well that it’s not possible to mon

> When discussing a law let's not discuss alleged things, be precise and talk about facts, was it done or not? You know full well that it’s not possible to monitor or examine what these companies do, because we don’t have total transparency. > So much bias in your comment. The bias isn’t with me, but with you. Obviously you could have taken one second to do a search and find numerous articles on this, such as this one, where TikTok ADMITTED to storing US data in China, which means they lied under oath. That’s why a divestment is not enough to trust them: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2023/06/21/tiktok-confirms-data-china-bytedance-security-cfius/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2023/06/21/tikt... > Do you think everything in this world should be controlled by the USA? I think the CCP is a corrupt authoritarian regime that used violent revolution and force to come into power and stay there. Most people don’t trust such regimes to control anything. It’s not about the US, or even Chinese people, but about Chinese leadership. > Every country has its laws, companies should abide by them, and the USA as far as I am aware was a proponent of free trade, capitalism and democracy I’m not sure what point you’re making. Banning TikTok worldwide would be consistent with all three.