3 ms·
> Basically if Tesla decided to self-insure when autopilot is engaged, it would be the same. So it's not the same as Tesla. Reading Reddit now that FSD has bee
by matsemann 3y ago
> Basically if Tesla decided to self-insure when autopilot is engaged, it would be the same.
So it's not the same as Tesla. Reading Reddit now that FSD has been available to not just those having bought into the hype has been interesting. It seems more stressful to use than just driving yourself.
- ra7 3y agoCan confirm Tesla FSD is more stressful than driving yourself. I’ve been using it for a few weeks since they offered everyone free trial. Seems to be improved from the previous version, but still requires a ton of interventions every single drive. It’s cool to experience for people who are tech savvy, but nowhere near the realm of being useful and replacing your driving needs.
- herewego 3y agoAgreed. Every time I’ve used it or been in a Tesla as a passenger with FSD engaged, human intervention has been required several times each trip to avoid accidents, harm to pedestrians, or moving violations. It’s frankly embarrassing to use and terrifying to imagine the masses relying on it in any way in its current form.
- ec109685 3y agoNot in the situations that Mercedes is allowing L3: some roads in traffic. The Tesla does really well there.
- ra7 3y agoThen Tesla should take liability in those conditions, if they are confident.