4 ms·
>This does not mean that they were cruel, at all, but rather that they understood rising and killing animals as fundamental for their livelihood. The banality
by WalterSear 2y ago
>This does not mean that they were cruel, at all, but rather that they understood rising and killing animals as fundamental for their livelihood.
The banality of evil. Enron executives' behaviour was also fundamental to their livelihood.
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y agoNature itself is evil by this standard
- WalterSear 2y ago1. Yes. 2. That's irrelevant on multiple levels 3. Cognitive abstractions aren't beings, can't have a morality to evaluate. "As moral as Darwinian Evolution" is not a good look, particularly in regards to livelihood rather than survival.