4 ms·
Agree with most of what you said, which is unfortunate (except for the silver lining that machines have the potential to massively increase both the supply and
by andai 3y ago
Agree with most of what you said, which is unfortunate (except for the silver lining that machines have the potential to massively increase both the supply and quality of medical treatment).
One bit puzzles me though, why would human doctors have an edge in research? Wouldn't the "person" who can read a trillion times more, remember everything, cross-reference it, and monitor billions of realtime data points (from billions of patients) for patterns, have a slight advantage?
- WaitWaitWha 3y agoMy conjecture is that some research requires a type of out of the box thinking that is not readily available in current technical solutions.
- cycomanic 3y agoI find it interesting that you are so bullish on AI to replace doctors. Similar to fully autonomous driving, I think we need a leap towards GAI to really replace doctors. At the moment we see way too many failure modes that seem to be inherit in how ML systems work. Don't get me wrong I think ML systems will be great helper systems but I don't see them replace doctors any time soon, if not for the simple reason that a person is much more likely to trust another person than an electronic system and that is actually part of both diagnostics and treatment