> It also seems to me that a lot of what is nowadays called philosophy is just pretty transparent cover for religious apologetics. Yeah. There is an ideal noti

> It also seems to me that a lot of what is nowadays called philosophy is just pretty transparent cover for religious apologetics. Yeah. There is an ideal notion of a "love of knowledge" and following it where it leads, but almost everyone fails at some point. But it is a shame when a deeply flawed published work gets more attention than it deserves. In my opinion, teaching philosophy as a historic progression should not be the only nor default way. Sometimes it really is better to start afresh.