3 ms·
I used both Win95 and Win98 and i don't remember crashes with the OS itself or most "software" to be much of a thing, even though i was already doing some progr
by badsectoracula 3y ago
I used both Win95 and Win98 and i don't remember crashes with the OS itself or most "software" to be much of a thing, even though i was already doing some programming (mainly Delphi) on it.
I do remember games causing tons of issues, hard locks and "endless" BSODs where trying to recover just had you enter another BSOD - so you had to restart the computer and sometimes the FAT would be corrupted (but it was always some game-related thing that got corrupted).
Windows 3.1 was way more unstable IME - that is an OS where i did lose work, but Win9x, at least when it came to applications, was much more stable and you could often recover.
Though i think system stability also heavily depended on your PC, there were a lot of shoddy components during the 90s that created weird compatibility issues which manifested as BSODs or other weirdness. Fortunately that stuff seemed to improve dramatically during the early 2000s.
- brnt 3y agoI know ME got a bad rep, and I'm sure it crashed often for many, but for me it was by far the stablest 9x, and I really didn't have any issues with it. I really switched to 2000 (which was great) because I went with a dual CPU setup.
- lupusreal 3y agoWhat I remember the most was endless BSODs when using Microsoft Office. No autosave (that I knew of anyway) made that hell.
- nwellinghoff 3y agoOnce you ran memtest x86 to make sure you had decent mem sticks and got your driver combo right it was all very stable. But yeah, it took a lot of fiddling to get it that way.