3 ms·
Even if the threshold is only “reasonable suspicion”, that test fails for large numbers of people whose DNA was found in an AC.
by sokoloff 3y ago
Even if the threshold is only “reasonable suspicion”, that test fails for large numbers of people whose DNA was found in an AC.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- shkkmo 3y agoGo read about geofenced warrants to learn how warrants for the data for large numers of people, most of whom obviously can't all be involved. Then get back to me.
- sokoloff 3y agoCell phone location data or automatic number plate reading is far less personal than DNA and is (IMO, rightly) treated differently.
- shkkmo 3y agoAFAIK, location tracking requires probable cause to get a warrant. So the "different treatment" is that the standards for evidence for location data warrants are on average higher. I'm not trying to say anything about the way things should be, but rather to correct you when you falsely reassure people that this won't and can't be used this way.