4 ms·
I am not saying that TempleOS wasn't a technical marvel. It was. I am merely stating the fact that its usage was (mainly) limited to recreation. Not that tha
by djaouen 3y ago
I am not saying that TempleOS wasn't a technical marvel. It was. I am merely stating the fact that its usage was (mainly) limited to recreation. Not that that's a bad thing, but my own ambition is to produce something with more than margi... small product-market fit.
Edit: I'm sorry if I come across as arrogant. I still have the "decoration" (programming-wise) of my elite education I am trying to trim. :(
- ahahahahah 3y ago[flagged]
- djaouen 3y agoSigh.
- VS1999 3y agoThis is your third nearly identical post in this thread. Is it so important to you that people don't find value in something you think isn't notable?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wiseowise 3y agoI’m not them, but parroting something without having any substance behind it is how myths are born.
- bheadmaster 3y agoHow is replying with just "no, it wasn't" without any elaboration better? Or how will it help stop the spread of the myth? It won't change anyone's mind, that's for sure.
- wiseowise 3y agoFair enough.
- iforgotpassword 3y agoI think enough people in this very comment section have brought forward good points regarding what exactly they find noteworthy, impressive or inspiring about TempleOS, while that person has left nothing but dismissive comments without substance.