3 ms·
Sounds like that’s solved by raising prices, no?
by BaculumMeumEst 3y ago
Sounds like that’s solved by raising prices, no?
- forkerenok 3y agoYep, exactly my thought. Start raising prices (via taxes or touristic accommodation quotas or whatever) and find that goldilocks zone balancing revenue and pressure on the environment/locals.
- ggpsv 3y agoThe problem here is that this creates negative externalities on the housing market unless regulation is in place. Otherwise, it creates an incentive for short-term housing over long-term housing, which affects the people who do live there. This is the crux of the matter in many places that have a problem with tourism.
- BaculumMeumEst 3y agoRegulation is definitely necessary to protect low-income residents. Areas that understand this and implement it well will be rewarded for it.
- _1_1_1_1_1_1_ 3y agotax stays of less than 3 months by 50%
- chgs 3y agoSurely it’s self limiting, as more tourists arrive the attractiveness goes down. From a sustainability point of view though 10,000 people concentrated in a single tourist complex is better than 100 villages with 100 people each.
- defrost 3y agoIt's not a 100 villages though, is it? It's 2.2 million local residents living a long term largely sustainable life that are being swamped by an additional non resident 13.9 million people per annum.
- Snoozus 3y agoNothing is sustainable about living on the canaries. Energy is largely imported fossile fuel, water comes from desalination via said energy. The banana monocultures are an ecological desaster as well.
- lupusreal 3y agoEconomic sustainability != Environmental sustainability
- chgs 3y agoTourism in general is unsustainable but mass tourism in limited areas is more sustainable per head than spread out tourism
- defrost 2y agoTourism here, as in most places overrun with tourism, isn't advancing by consolidating all prior tourist locations into a single more efficient tourist hotspot, it's proceeding by adding on additional tourist mega plexes.