3 ms·
My POV: I have been a resident of Tennessee for half my life. I have been in Chattanooga since VW first began rolling vehicles off their local lines. Additional
by ProllyInfamous 3y ago
My POV: I have been a resident of Tennessee for half my life. I have been in Chattanooga since VW first began rolling vehicles off their local lines. Additionally, I have experience both independent and as a union electrician (IBEW). I live in a lower middle class neighborhood, within 1 mile of VW's Tenn facility [so many of my neighbors work at VW]. I've had many clients employed by VW.
>why is this great?
VW's Chattanooga operation has been notorious for last-minute "mandatory overtime," ignoring legitimate health&safety concerns, and not actually paying that well for our local economy (despite what HQ claims).
I think the greatest thing that will come of this is MUCH better healthcare for VW families [@IBEW, benefits cost the same whether 1 or 10 dependents — they actually don't suck (albeit not incredible)]. Quality of life will also improve by having safeguards in place to prevent (e.g.) forced overtime and unplanned scheduling.
--
My rhetorical question about unions is this: if they really were so bad for employees, why would companies spend so much [and sometimes violate laws] attempting to prevent union organization efforts.
--
To me, the greatest thing about this particular VW unionizing news is that it marks a change in demographics, here in the Deep South. People are beginning to realize just how fucked inequality entitles them [i.e. not much], so are organizing their greatest asset: time/labor.
- jjtheblunt 3y agoThat makes total sense to me; thanks for the thoughful response.
- pxmpxm 3y agoI thought the universal consensus is that it's net benefit for the currently employed, where the product, company/shareholders and employment bears the cost. Zero sum game, with negative externalities. In particular, flexible employment is what allowed US to recover from covid much quicker than europe, for example.
- asadotzler 3y agoIf the net benefits of not having a union accrue to the company and shareholders, perhaps having a union to balance things out is a good thing. I mean, without the workers, there is no company, management, or customer. Seems the workers should get their fair share of output and if they're not they have no way to change that except to beg or quit. With a union, collective bargaining can lead to contracts that are more balanced for workers/owners and that's a good thing for everyone because those workers are consumers too who need good pay to buy a good life to drive production of good life goods and services.