3 ms·
> he does not say what you are describing Starting to think you don't know Dennett, this is what he was all about haha. > John Searle debunked You're startin
by _akhe 2y ago
> he does not say what you are describing
Starting to think you don't know Dennett, this is what he was all about haha.
> John Searle debunked
You're starting to reveal your lack of experience here. It's not something that can be debunked, it's just an observation and one that is widely considered foundational :)
Not only that, but that's like from his youth, he's done a lot more interesting stuff since Chinese Room - this seems like you just quickly googled.
I wish this was a better conversation, brush up!
- pdonis 2y ago> Starting to think you don't know Dennett Starting to think you haven't read very much of him, or haven't bothered to actually engage with what you've read. > You're starting to reveal your lack of experience here. It's not something that can be debunked Tell that to all the people who have written articles debunking it. > I wish this was a better conversation, brush up! I'm having the same thought about you. So I doubt we're going to make much progress.
- _akhe 2y ago> debunking I don't even agree with Dennett, just pointing out what his stance is in response to your weird attack. A stance that everyone knows except you apparently, didn't even know it was argued. He is eliminative of consciousness, and is basically famous as a philosopher for it, second to the religious stuff.
- pdonis 2y ago> I don't even agree with Dennett That's obvious. But I do. However, it's also obvious that the Dennett I agree with is not the Dennett that you disagree with. And what's more, it's obvious that we're not going to resolve that here. We agree he's a famous philosopher. That's enough for here.