This conversation is entirely unproductive. I’ve said twice now that the phenomenon you described (and mislabeled as quackery) is called “talking past each oth

This conversation is entirely unproductive. I’ve said twice now that the phenomenon you described (and mislabeled as quackery) is called “talking past each other” and it’s a common criticism. I then linked you to a paper discussing this, and I agreed with you that this is a problem. The definition of quackery is relevant here, because it implies that philosophical works exist which are deliberately “fake” or pretending to be philosophy when they aren’t. A doctor that is unproductive and wastes everyone’s time isn’t a quack, they’re just unproductive. The phenomenon you described is therefore not quackery, it’s just being unproductive in a way often referred to as “talking past one another.” This is just a rehashing of the exact same thing I already said. I cannot make this any more clear.