4 ms·
The share of first-time homebuyers speaks to the issue a bit more clearly than the factors you've been looking at above. https://www.statista.com/statistics/20
by swatcoder 2y ago
The share of first-time homebuyers speaks to the issue a bit more clearly than the factors you've been looking at above.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/208072/share-of-first-time-home-buyers-usa/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/208072/share-of-first-ti...
People who are already positioned in real estate aren't as affected by rapid price increases when they're looking to sell one home and buy another because the home they're selling was along for the ride. They're impacted, but much less so than first-time homebuyers who are either short on assets altogether (most working individuals/families trying to take the next step on the default treadmill) or have assets that haven't been performing as well as real estate.
Those first-time buyers need to directly relate the purchase price of the home to their savings and income and it gotten very hard for them to that. The worse it gets and the longer it sustains, the more it looks like a failure to attend an entire generation of workers and their families.
- RestlessMind 2y agoI am not able to see that graph since Statista is asking me to log in. Is there any archive link? Having said that, I agree with your overall argument. That seems interesting and might explain the gap between FRED stats and the general sentiment.
- swatcoder 2y agoOh, sorry. They must allow clickthrough from search engines but not direct links. I never even noticed they had a login wall. I don't know or use any archiving service, but you should be able to bring up a working link by searching "statista first-time homebuyer" on Duck Duck Go (or probably elsewhere) Otherwsie, maybe somebody else can generate an archive link. Sorry!