4 ms·
Relevant part of the quote which started this discussion: >“[a]n unapproved change [...] Unapproved, to me, implies that it was not reviewed or signed-off. >
by ziddoap 3y ago
Relevant part of the quote which started this discussion:
>“[a]n unapproved change [...]
Unapproved, to me, implies that it was not reviewed or signed-off.
>Part of the sign off was almost certainly "does not need retesting" for implementation
If you are not assuring your quality, you have a QA failure. Regardless, I initially said "serious policy and procedure failure". Which, if you change a safety-critical component in your product and don't do testing on it, that is a serious policy failure.
- taeric 3y agoAh, totally fair. I took that to be "unapproved all the way back to the designer." Which, yeah, that doesn't happen. It almost certainly has approval from a line manager at the bare minimum, if it helps perform the assembly. If it goes to more teams than a single line, it gets more approval. I think I largely biased to the next message, which did indicate reviews would happen, but that they have some freedom at the line. And that still sounds right to me.