3 ms·

We need some clear legislation around this right now.

• stronglikedan 3y ago
  counterpoint: we don't need any more legislation
  • qwertox 3y ago
    I tend towards agreeing with you. Many of the problems, like impersonation, are already illegal. And replacing a person which spreads lies, as can be seen in most TV or glossy cover ads, shouldn't trigger some new legal action. The only difference is that now the actor is also a lie. And countries which use actors or news anchors for spreading propaganda surely won't see an issue with replacing them with AI characters. People who then get to read that their most favorite, stunningly beautiful Instagram or TikTok influencer is nothing but a fat, chips-eating ugly person using AI, may try to raise some legal issues to soothe their disappointment. They then might raise a point which sounds reasonable, but which would then force politicians to also tackle the lies which are spread in TV/Magazines ads. Maybe clearly labeling any use of this tech, maybe even with a QR code linking to who is the owner of the AI, similar to QR codes on meat packaging which allow you to track the origin of the meat, would be something what laws could be helpful with, in the spirit of transparency.
• 4ndrewl 3y ago
  In which jurisdiction?
  • karaterobot 3y ago
    What jurisdiction would not benefit from legislation around duplicating people's identities using AI?
• CamperBob2 3y ago
  Legislation only impairs the good guys.