2 ms·
Yes, gpt4 will beat 99.9% of humans on 99.9% of subjects. But it's terrible at leetcode. For "easy" questions sure it's great, and even some medium, but often
by willsmith72 3y ago
Yes, gpt4 will beat 99.9% of humans on 99.9% of subjects. But it's terrible at leetcode.
For "easy" questions sure it's great, and even some medium, but often at a medium level and almost always at a hard level, it'll give you a classic confident-but-terribly-wrong response. Prompting it to look at its mistakes will usually lead to the "oops yes that was wrong, here's the corrected version:", which is also wrong.
- zug_zug 3y agoMaybe relative to us on this forum it's not so impressive but that's a rare skill that we've dedicated years to honing. What % of the general population can leetcode better than chatgtp? 5%? 1%?
- willsmith72 3y agodefinitely less than 1%, and we're in agreement in general i only take issue with leetcode as an example. i would say gpt4 is great at coding, and also api and db schema design. but leetcode is specific coding tasks with clear right and wrong answers, where getting 80% of a right answer is still wrong. gpt4 and my mum have roughly the same chance of getting the right answer to a hard leetcode problem, that's my only point