6 ms·
I think you have this exactly right. They are so good at what you might call "hallucinations" that we have just gone ahead and repurposed them, dropping them in
by glenstein 3y ago
I think you have this exactly right. They are so good at what you might call "hallucinations" that we have just gone ahead and repurposed them, dropping them into all kinds of contexts where it's good enough, even though it's not what it's strictly trained for.
Rather than hallucinations being treated like an interesting puzzle or paradox at the center of AI intrinsically, I think it's incidental to the types of models that have been trained, and it's conceivable that they could be trained against a notion of reliable sources and the relation between their statements and such sources.