2 ms·
edit: nevermind! I had my threads mixed up. This is entirely a fair question for this thread. ------ previously ------ It is substantially less often correct,
by Groxx 3y ago
edit: nevermind! I had my threads mixed up. This is entirely a fair question for this thread.
------ previously ------
It is substantially less often correct, yes. That's why we're talking about it.
Whether it's showing human-like cognition or not is irrelevant for its utility, or fitness for basically any non-cognition-research use.
- adolph 3y agoIs it an evaluable fact that any particular LLM "is substantially less often correct" than what? The comparison to biology is to ask if what is termed "hallucinations" are different from what human minds do.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]