4 ms·
I'm sure that removing laptops from the equation of the cafe's atmosphere has some effect. I see that there is another cafe in the same city that doesn't allow
by karaterobot 3y ago
I'm sure that removing laptops from the equation of the cafe's atmosphere has some effect. I see that there is another cafe in the same city that doesn't allow any devices at all. I'd be interested in knowing what the difference between them is: what is a place like without laptops, but with smartphones and tablets? Is that the exact formula for the mood they're trying to achieve, or is it a compromise?
- ghaff 3y agoI'd probably vote for compromise. It's really hard to tell people not to use their phones to read email, read a website or paper, etc. in most circumstances. You can reasonably ban laptop use (which probably also has the side effect of people not camping out for as long). I'm not sure banning a smartphone/Kindle/tablet looks all that different from banning reading entirely other than possibly resulting in a different mix of clientele.
- BlueTemplar 3y agoE-paper only computers might actually be an interesting rule...
- ghaff 3y agoThat's really artificial though. For a given trip I might bring a Kindle or a Tablet.
- BlueTemplar 3y agoIn the sense that it inconveniences you, yes. In the sense that not having the possibility to watch video might make for a more mindful (?) environment rising the level of serendipity of engaging with other people... (Now that I think of, banning headphones and speakers too - other than the ones of the establishment itself.)
- ghaff 3y agoAt some point, a coffeeshop that is more or less forcing random socialization among customers seems like a tough sell. But, who knows, maybe it could be a selling point for some demographics based on uniqueness.