4 ms·
your not considering users device being compromised, nor usability...plus nowadays, to "exemplify user privacy" is not to reinvent the infrastructure but to dem
by pestatije 3y ago
your not considering users device being compromised, nor usability...plus nowadays, to "exemplify user privacy" is not to reinvent the infrastructure but to demonstrate users data is not sold on their back and non-collusion with secret agencies / law enforcement
- anbardoi 3y agoThe service I'm creating is an anonymous blogging website with a '.dev' extension. It will be made for developers, who are more technically inclined. The reason I am intentionally not considering user device security, is because with this method, I intend to give users ownership of their data. They own their computer, they own their security. I just want to provide a secure means of blogging where they dont have to worry about my server being compromised, because if it is, the attacker will only see sha256 checksums associated with user posts/comments. The posts/comments themselves will be publicly available just by visiting the website.