3 ms·
Do you think Supabase Storage (now or in the future) could be an attractive standalone S3 provider as an alternative to e.g MinIO?
by filleokus 2y ago
Do you think Supabase Storage (now or in the future) could be an attractive standalone S3 provider as an alternative to e.g MinIO?
- kiwicopple 2y agoIt's more of a "accessibility layer" on top of S3 or any other s3-compatible backend (which means that it also works with MinIO out-of-the-box [0]) I don't think we'll ever build the underlying storage layer. I'm a big fan of what the Tigris[1] team have built if you're looking for other good s3 alternatives [0] https://github.com/supabase/storage/blob/master/docker-compose.yml#L59 https://github.com/supabase/storage/blob/master/docker-compo... [1] Tigris: https://tigrisdata.com https://tigrisdata.com
- masfuerte 2y agoI'm still confused. Who is paying Amazon? Is it 1. You buy the storage from Amazon so I pay you and don't interact with Amazon at all or 2. I buy storage from Amazon and you provide managed access to it?
- kiwicopple 2y agoit's 1 - you pay us, we pay AWS. In the future we will likely provide "bring your own s3" (2)
- ovaistariq 2y agoI appreciate the callout to Tigris. Now it’s super easy to use Tigris with Supabase for all those files.