4 ms·
No kidding. UI design peaked with Windows 98/2000 and Mac OS 9.
by drooopy 2y ago
No kidding. UI design peaked with Windows 98/2000 and Mac OS 9.
- edwcross 2y agoI think one of the major "sins" of those interfaces (that is still pervasive today) is the inability to select text on most labels. Back then, Google did not exist, but being able to select and copy the text on e.g. an error message is something that has since become very useful, and that's still not afforded by GUIs. Well, at least nowadays we can use ridiculous solutions such as normcap (taking a screenshot and OCRing it) to get such a basic feature.
- 5- 2y agoyou can (or could?) press ctrl-c in most windows dialogue boxes to get a nice text representation in your clipboard.
- mbork_pl 2y agoMy solution to this is to use Emacs whenever I can. (Almost) any text in Emacs is in some buffer, so you can usually mark (select) it, kill (cut) it etc.
- Terr_ 2y agoOn that note, the css property user-select [0] may be useful to anyone trying to implement this kind of usability. It can also be used to ensure a whole block of text is selected and copied as a unit. That is helpful for things like a an error message or an identifier like ABC-123. [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/user-select https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/user-select
- layer8 2y agoOn Windows, you can press Ctrl+C to copy the contents of native message boxes. Admittedly not very discoverable. They should have added it to the System menu as well. A general facility to select labels should use an additional modifier key, since otherwise unsophisticated users will tend to select labels by mistake and get confused. Labels are already actionable elements, in that clicking on them focuses the associated control, or even changes its state as in the case of check boxes and radio buttons. Another example are the labels of menu items and buttons. Adding selection when you move the mouse a bit while hitting a label is too finicky IMO. If the UI is also a touch interface, it would only get worse.
- edwcross 2y agoThanks! I had never heard about it. From what this website says (https://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/110153 https://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/110153), this behavior started on Windows 2000, which might explain why it didn't work on my emulated Windows 98...
- glandium 2y agoWindows 7 was still fine IMO. Things went sideways after that. First versions of OSX were fine too.
- mardifoufs 2y agoI guess this is just a case of baby duck syndrome, which is so common in UI and UX discussions. I just don't see how word 97 is in any shape or form better than say, office 2019 in terms of UIs. Unless you're into obscure sub Sub menus in a single menu box that has no hints as what it contains or what it does. No preview, nothing.