3 ms·
Only for executives? Sounds like a good move actually.
by raziel2p 2y ago
Only for executives? Sounds like a good move actually.
- rapidaneurism 2y agoThe shit trickles down. I foresee Saturday morning meetings for their direct reports, etc until everyone works 6 days, or signal themselves as disloyal non team players.
- boxed 2y agoIt's a pity managers see themselves as "up". They should see themselves as below the engineers and accountants and whatever. Managing is a supporting role if done properly. The boss mentality is corrosive.
- catoc 2y agoAs we say at home: "fallen upwards due to lack of weight."
- CraftingLinks 2y agoI tend to sympathise with this view. The "up" part is only justified if responsibility also falls on their shoulders when shit hits the wall due to their decisions.
- eviks 2y agoWhy do you see support being down? You can support from above
- boxed 2y agoLike a house, or a bridge. Yea, a bridge can be a suspension bridge but it ALSO has MOST of the support below the road.
- self_awareness 2y agoManager needs to access/modify the compensation information for the employee. Employee will never see the compensation info of the manager. This is why the manager will always be seen as being above.
- boxed 2y agoThat seems like a pretty big leap. Here in Sweden anyone can ask the state for the total income for anyone else at any time, so clearly that's not the case.
- rzr 2y agoHelping the boss is always on "voluntary basis" (aka there is no choice)...