4 ms·

Not sure why this got voted down. It was an honest question. Gentoo said no AI contributions. Artwork is a contribution, and someone will use AI to do it. I

by MR4D 2y ago

Not sure why this got voted down. It was an honest question. Gentoo said no AI contributions. Artwork is a contribution, and someone will use AI to do it. I’m just pointing out that this will actually be hard to enforce, and I think someone will test it sooner rather than later. Artwork would be the obvious vector to do that, and I wonder how long before someone tries it.

Lockal 2y ago
(I did not downvote and can't even do it), but Gentoo does not accept art contributions of any kind (human/ai), there is just no place for this. But in previous discussion[1] somebody mentioned that pkgxdev/pantry[2] generated image for RabbitMQ - "gloriously bonkers", I recovered the image from web archive - https://web.archive.org/web/20240419091549/https://gui.tea.xyz/prod/rabbitmq.com/1024x1024.webp https://web.archive.org/web/20240419091549/https://gui.tea.x... . I guess I'll refrain from explaining what's wrong here.... [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40038372 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40038372 [2] https://github.com/pkgxdev/pantry/issues/5358 https://github.com/pkgxdev/pantry/issues/5358
- MR4D 2y ago
  Thanks for that. This is exactly what I meant - it’s extraordinarily hard to police, even though I agree with the sentiment.
- throwaway7356 2y ago
  > Gentoo does not accept art contributions of any kind (human/ai), there is just no place for this. Okay, let's do a short fact check on that: 1. Visit https://gentoo.org https://gentoo.org, notice logo in top left: a first sign of contributed art. 2. But wait, what is this? https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/artwork/ https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/artwork/ A full page of contributed artwork and a box titled "Contribute artwork". > I guess I'll refrain from explaining what's wrong here.... Seems reasonable.

4 ms·

Not sure why this got voted down. It was an honest question. Gentoo said no AI contributions. Artwork is a contribution, and someone will use AI to do it. I

by MR4D 2y ago

Lockal 2y ago
(I did not downvote and can't even do it), but Gentoo does not accept art contributions of any kind (human/ai), there is just no place for this. But in previous discussion[1] somebody mentioned that pkgxdev/pantry[2] generated image for RabbitMQ - "gloriously bonkers", I recovered the image from web archive - https://web.archive.org/web/20240419091549/https://gui.tea.xyz/prod/rabbitmq.com/1024x1024.webp https://web.archive.org/web/20240419091549/https://gui.tea.x... . I guess I'll refrain from explaining what's wrong here.... [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40038372 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40038372 [2] https://github.com/pkgxdev/pantry/issues/5358 https://github.com/pkgxdev/pantry/issues/5358
- MR4D 2y ago
  Thanks for that. This is exactly what I meant - it’s extraordinarily hard to police, even though I agree with the sentiment.
- throwaway7356 2y ago
  > Gentoo does not accept art contributions of any kind (human/ai), there is just no place for this. Okay, let's do a short fact check on that: 1. Visit https://gentoo.org https://gentoo.org, notice logo in top left: a first sign of contributed art. 2. But wait, what is this? https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/artwork/ https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/artwork/ A full page of contributed artwork and a box titled "Contribute artwork". > I guess I'll refrain from explaining what's wrong here.... Seems reasonable.