3 ms·
It's nice to see a web browser with an integrated editor - a feature of the original WorldWideWeb browser. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldWideWeb https://e
by musicale 3y ago
It's nice to see a web browser with an integrated editor - a feature of the original WorldWideWeb browser.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldWideWeb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldWideWeb
- j45 3y agoIt’s a great way to get readers and consumers to become writers and creators
- azinman2 3y agoExcept now it’s not, really. Squarespace, blogs, even Twitter is a far better set of tools that are much easier, handle hosting and distribution etc.
- Dalewyn 3y ago[flagged]
- thewakalix 3y agoIt's not even necessary for compression -- gzip is decent and transparent.
- idle_zealot 3y agoIt's not done for compression, it's about tree-shaking and bundling dependencies.
- trelane 3y agoAnd failing in weird abd obscure ways if your browser is slightly outside the mainstream. Like if it's SeaMonkey.
- j45 3y agoI didn’t say it was the best. It’s easily accessible, people can learn the ins and outs of html directly. Hosting on a baked in service will be easier, this tool is meant to be used for other purposes.
- judge2020 3y agoNot the exact same thing, but: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/designMode https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/de...
- musicale 3y agoGood point – I'd nearly forgotten about design mode! I wonder what other browsers include a user-facing feature and UI to enable it and make it useful? You can enable it in the javascript console (document.designMode = 'on') , but the lack of an editing UI makes it less useful. The onramp to web page creation – and javascript programming in the browser for that matter[1] – is tantalizingly close. I wish it were a bit more discoverable in mainstream browsers. [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/play https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/play