That could be their way to try and create a contractual provision that works the function of the economic loss doctrine; not a bizarre provision. It is a very i

That could be their way to try and create a contractual provision that works the function of the economic loss doctrine; not a bizarre provision. It is a very interesting question to someone who is a student of both cryptography and extremely slimy corporate entities. Edit: checked your history and I doubt there’s much need to explain this to anyone in this part of the thread, really. :)