4 ms·
There's local S3 API clones available, e.g. http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/parkplace http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/parkplace That said, it sounds like the
by ggruschow 18y ago
There's local S3 API clones available, e.g. http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/parkplace http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/parkplace
That said, it sounds like the filesystem is the right tool for your purposes.
I don't want to manage (all) my storage, but I'm trying to avoid using S3 as both the primary and backup (thus wasting the money and effort spent attempting to reduce risk).
- david927 18y agoThanks; you're right. Doing disk + S3 is a great idea. I'll implement it immediately. I also have an idea of how I can implement disk + SimpleDB as well, which would make everything faster and easier. (It also solves the inconsistency from the delay before written data is replicated across SimpleDB servers.) Thanks for that! (I wish I could help you with an answer to your dilemma in return. :)