> Untargeted advertising pays 90+% less than targeted advertising. Perhaps if this kind of targeting is banned, the advertising budgets will be spent of untarg

> Untargeted advertising pays 90+% less than targeted advertising. Perhaps if this kind of targeting is banned, the advertising budgets will be spent of untargeted advertising instead, raising the prices of non-targeted advertising? Perhaps advertisers (at least those with useful products) will find that less invasive targeting is good enough, such advertising e.g. knitting-related products next to knitting-related content?