3 ms·
Why would you expect the last sentence to be true? Wouldn't you expect the brains of chickens to be vast, and yours to be even more so?
by DiggyJohnson 3y ago
Why would you expect the last sentence to be true? Wouldn't you expect the brains of chickens to be vast, and yours to be even more so?
- yawpitch 3y agoWhy, precisely? Larger volume? Don’t know about you, but over the years I’ve met a lot of humans that can’t obviously outthink a higher-end chicken.
- DiggyJohnson 3y agoI was asking seriously. But yea, I think there seems to be aspects of human intelligence not shared by our chicken cousins. Both are remarkable, but there doesn’t seem to be any reason to believe a chicken is smarter than a human besides misanthropy.
- Solvency 3y agoI never said chickens were smarter than us, I said my chickens are visually processing far more than I possibly can all while engaged in mentally and physically taxing activities.
- DiggyJohnson 3y ago> my chickens are visually processing far more than I possibly can This is what I'm responding to. I don't know how to reconcile your two sentences, but no problem.
- yawpitch 3y agoLet’s put it this way… the common ancestor of humans and chickens is way back, well before the dinosaurs. Their visual processing systems are on an entirely different, essentially unrelated vector from our own… so are their eyes. They can see in ultraviolet, for one, and you can’t, so they’re literally processing far more information than you can even perceive… comparing these two visual systems isn’t apples and oranges, it’s apples and orangutans. The point is to not underestimate what other brains are doing, just because they’re not familiar.
- DiggyJohnson 3y agoThanks for the explanation. I see where you're coming from now.