3 ms·
> We can always add more regulations, though there's an official process to it. Right, I feel like ultimately this is a debate about what happens in that windo
by afavour 3y ago
> We can always add more regulations, though there's an official process to it.
Right, I feel like ultimately this is a debate about what happens in that window.
“There is no regulation in this potentially dangerous area, companies should be free to do what they wish while we craft regulation”
vs
“There is no regulation in this potentially dangerous area, we should heavily limit what companies can do while we craft regulation”
- _heimdall 3y agoYeah that's an old debate for sure. Its effectively an offshoot of the question of whether governments have power by default unless limited by the people, or if power is granted at the lowest level unless specifically given to the higher authorities. In this case, it seems like having regulations is a horse and pony show if the government can enforce regulations that don't yet exist. In the most kind view, writing regulations is helpful so we at least know what they already plan to enforce. In a pessimistic view, writing regulations is only done to help the public think that everything is above board and that power isn't, and won't, be abused.