3 ms·
It's on the capital holders to make sure that the deadlines are reachable and appropriate to the amount of time you actually have working normally, rushing as a
by realusername 3y ago
It's on the capital holders to make sure that the deadlines are reachable and appropriate to the amount of time you actually have working normally, rushing as a worker doesn't make any sense.
Either they miscalculated the number of employees they needed or they just aren't profitable enough to sustain the workload, both cases are failures on the company side.
And sure, if the company is willing to, they can share some of that risk and reward associated with it to the employees
- cqqxo4zV46cp 3y agoYou’re clearly saying this from a position of privilege. A whole lot of “should” not any “this is how it is in reality”.
- realusername 3y agoSure, I'm opened to some strict law enforcement and heavy fines to make sure the company doesn't step outside their boundaries.
- lotsofpulp 3y ago>both cases are failures on the company side. Who/what/why fails is irrelevant. Anytime you are selling something, including labor, there exists a risk that the buyer stops paying, for myriad reasons. One of those reasons is that the buyer themselves (which could be a business) are not able to sell. Which means that some of the “capital holder’s” risk is inherently a worker’s risk.
- realusername 3y agoThe worker usually has no input on that anyways, what can you realistically do if the business model doesn't work?