3 ms·
Here we go again... Another nobel prize, another decade of impotent battery news, and countless superconductivity false starts.
by throwup238 3y ago
Here we go again... Another nobel prize, another decade of impotent battery news, and countless superconductivity false starts.
- SturgeonsLaw 3y ago“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.” Theodore Roosevelt
- aledalgrande 3y agoDid you even read the article? It doesn't even have superconductor properties. It's classed as a semiconductor with 2 free sites.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]