3 ms·
Buying a newspaper to alter coverage of one's own story not only crosses ethical lines but also mirrors an oligarch’s tactic to manipulate public perception. Y
by redundantly 3y ago
Buying a newspaper to alter coverage of one's own story not only crosses ethical lines but also mirrors an oligarch’s tactic to manipulate public perception.
Your dismissal of these actions exposes a lack of objectivity and betrays your partisan stance.
- NicoJuicy 3y agoI have Cloudflare stocks, not denying that. I have them based on how it's management is, the company/employees and the product. I'm not saying there couldn't be an ethical issue. I'm saying I don't see proof atm. I see suggestions in that direction, but not proof. There are many unknowns here and I'm giving the benefit of doubt based on past perception, but yeah, I don't know him in person. What I think: - neighbor feud, never fun. We don't know a root case - a newspaper that got bought close to where he grew up. There are tons of variables to consider here. Perhaps read their interpretation and take it into consideration: https://www.parkrecord.com/opinion/tatiana-and-matthew-prince-the-papers-not-going-anywhere-now/ https://www.parkrecord.com/opinion/tatiana-and-matthew-princ... - he has a big place. As far as I can see, he worked for it. Nice What I see from his company ( my so called bias): - fair in the amount of possible, growing pains - accurate quarterly reports ( low balling future revenue) with detailed info on delicate things and interesting perceptions ( eg. Marketing headcount replacement during mass layoffs in other companies) - new boss in the department too then - good products that I want to use, interesting approaches ( eg. Egress costs vs. ml ingress). My employer uses them - potential cloud competitor ( huge market) Business wise. Sure, I'm biased because of my past analysis :)