3 ms·
My point with the original comment is that flight pricing today shows that people do know and care to avoid Boeing. The market value of a 737-MAX-9 flight is a
by nostrademons 3y ago
My point with the original comment is that flight pricing today shows that people do know and care to avoid Boeing. The market value of a 737-MAX-9 flight is about 1/3 of what a flight on any other airplane is, and even at that price they couldn't fill the plane. The scheduling was relatively convenient too, and my leg out (on Air Canada) was also a 737-MAX-9 that was discounted by about 2/3. That shows that consumers actually are actively avoiding the aircraft and factoring it into their purchasing decisions.
And TBH, if pricing were equal there's no way you could get me to fly on a 737-MAX. My thesis is just that everybody else is valuing the risk much higher than it is, and that 737-MAXes have likely had every bolt combed over at this point, and the systemic issues found indicate that really it's every plane made in the last 25 years that is risky.
- noirbot 3y agoI'd be really curious if that causal though. Airline pricing is an extreme black box, subject to tons of factors. Maybe the other flight is just at a better time for people traveling before/after some event? Or it's on an airline that more people prefer? So much of flying is done by corporate travel where you barely have a choice of time or layover or airline, let alone which plane you fly on. By contrast, I was booking a flight next month and could have gotten an Airbus flight for $150, but on an airline I loathe, so I took a 737 flight for $250 because assuming I don't die, it'll be a much better experience.