3 ms·
The actual proposed regulation [0] is definitely worth having a look at. For example: 5. This Regulation shall not create any obligation that would require a p
by prof-dr-ir 2y ago
The actual proposed regulation [0] is definitely worth having a look at. For example:
5. This Regulation shall not create any obligation that would require a provider of hosting services or a provider of interpersonal communications services to decrypt data or create access to end-to-end encrypted data, or that would prevent the provision of end-to-end encrypted services.
[0] page 36 onwards of https://www.patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-04-11-conseil-csam-compromis-9-avril.pdf https://www.patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/202...
- dsign 2y ago4a in page 37 is most tellingly crossed out. So I’m going to copy and paste 4a and instead of crossing it out invert its meaning: This Regulation shall lead to the general obligation to monitor the information which providers of hosting services transmit or store, to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity. It’s a good summary of the purpose of the law, I should say. Welcome to China… I mean, to the EU.