4 ms·
Calling it a “scam” is disingenuous, the product may be a bit crap for a v1 but their intention is to release people from the over-reliance on smartphones which
by jack_riminton 2y ago
Calling it a “scam” is disingenuous, the product may be a bit crap for a v1 but their intention is to release people from the over-reliance on smartphones which is to be commended
- croes 2y agoIf they knew beforehand that the projection won't work as promised then that part qualifies as scam.
- jack_riminton 2y agoDid they know or did they have hopes that their first implementation could be improved upon? I'm open-minded they've done something fraudulent I just haven't seen the evidence
- dmitrygr 2y agoAs TFM mentions, pico-projectors have been around for a while and have not improved (physics does not care how much you want it). Thus no sane non-scamer would "hope that their first implementation could be improved upon" This company was not even in business of developing new laser display tech. So who would improve it for them? And why would they have not in the previous decades?
- croes 2y agoThey knew it at least before they delivered the first units.