2 ms·
> People do not have the 'right' to do as they please with the image of another person. That's not the right under discussion. The right is, in your own words
by chrisjj 3y ago
> People do not have the 'right' to do as they please with the image of another person.
That's not the right under discussion.
The right is, in your own words: "the right to make photorealistic sexual material of their unconsenting obsession".
Your exaggeration of the scope does your argument no favour.
- 23B1 3y agoFortunately most lawmakers, for all their problems and issues, don't give a damn about pendantic nerds and will steamroll right over that argument - and rightfully so. This is one of those "I never agreed until it happened to me" type things.
- Grimblewald 3y agoRead usernames when replying. You are not replying to the op.