3 ms·
Do you claim that NATO means nothing? I don't think so. Of course all international treaties in the end are the act of good will and nobody can force Americans
by vbezhenar 3y ago
Do you claim that NATO means nothing? I don't think so. Of course all international treaties in the end are the act of good will and nobody can force Americans to fight for Poland if the need arises. But still it seems that Russia afraid of meddling with NATO countries so far.
- exe34 3y ago[flagged]
- hackerlight 3y ago> Pootin will start small invasions of NATO countries. To those that doubt this because of the risk, it won't be an outright invasion to start. It'll be a provocation with plausible deniability to test and undermine NATO's resolve and unity. Like a "little green men" scenario from 2014. A low stakes experiment with low risk and high reward. Simultaneously will be attempts to push support for far-left and far-right political ideas, for example by using migrants as a weapon and social media disinformation.
- lostlogin 3y ago> Do you claim that NATO means nothing? How is NATO working out at the moment with war at its doorstep and a series of threats, provocations and violations? I don’t see any sign that NATO is winning.
- checkyoursudo 3y agoLiving in Europe, I would rather be in NATO than not. I do not know if the other NATO countries would come to my country's defense, but the important thing is that the opponents of NATO do not know if they would not. I am not sure what NATO should be winning. We are not currently, formally at war, so to me that seems like winning enough. If NATO is not winning, then who is?