Yeah, that's what I personally got on my second reading of your comment. Though I did skim the first time. The transition from explaining Vassallo's argument t

Yeah, that's what I personally got on my second reading of your comment. Though I did skim the first time. The transition from explaining Vassallo's argument to explaining the problem with Vassallo's argument is a bit abrupt. It's not immediately clear whether you're referring to Vassallo or MKBHD at that point. I think maybe a line break around "It is fundamentally", or switching the pronoun to a proper noun, might help it parse better. Overall I liked the way you worded it.