3 ms·
That's like saying Occupy Wall Street should have protested in the Bronx, so they wouldn't disturb Wall Street.
by jart 3y ago
That's like saying Occupy Wall Street should have protested in the Bronx, so they wouldn't disturb Wall Street.
- maximinus_thrax 3y agoAnd look how effective the Occupy Wall Street protests have been!
- gorbot 3y agoOh yeah good idea anything that ends up failing shouldn’t be attempted in the first place Genius!! Why doesn’t everyone do that?! Cmon man hahah
- dh2022 3y agoOccupy Wall Street protests took place in a park. I assure you if the Occupy Wall Street protesters entered bank buildings and unfurled their banners they would have been arrested.
- CSMastermind 3y agoFor the record, Occupy Wall Street didn't disturb Wall Street. It was a small protest at a park a few blocks away. If you actually live in Manhattan it's hilarious how big of deal the media made what was ultimately an incredibly small and insignificant event.
- hollerith 3y agoThere are always Americans with a deep-seated belief that US society needs radical change; many of those are journalists. From about 1975 to about 2015 however US society was stable and radical change was very unlikely, so the radical journalists focused vast amounts of their attention on Occupy Wall Street because for a few years it was the movement most likely to cause radical change (that the journalists knew about) even though the actual likelihood was very low. Again, some journalists (and others) are constantly hoping for radical change; during periods of societal stability, that constant hope will result in their focusing on very slim hopes for radical change -- resulting in ridiculous exaggeration in the press of the importance of movements like Occupy Wall Street.